2005年考研英语一阅读理解翻译

Ⅰ 哪里能找到考研英语05-09年真题阅读理解的翻译啊

我是买参考书，里面很详细。

Ⅱ 急求05—12年每年考研英语完型的全文翻译

我09年考研 英语79分 告诉你 完型根本不用这么复习 在阅读理解上下工夫就好了 所以你不必要完型的翻译，就算需要 别人翻译你拿现成的也不如你自己翻译的提高的多

Ⅲ 2005考研英语一40-45题翻译

估计没有了,英语的分数太低了,今年的英语分数线估计得比去年的高.

Ⅳ 1996年-2005年考研英语阅读译文

去买书吧 周固的挺好的

Ⅳ 2005年考研英语阅读翻译

I can't see anything!
oh,so sorry, I have no that

Ⅵ 求2004年考研英语一翻译真题及解析

(61) The Greeks assumed that the structure of language had some connection with the process of thought, which took root in Europe long before people realized how diverse language could be.

句子分析：

这是一个带宾语从句，定语从句的复合句，其框架结构分析如下：

主句的主、谓结构：The Greeks assumed that 希腊人假定

宾语从句：the structure of language had some connection with the process of thought语言结构与思想的过程之间有某种联系

定语从句：which took root in Europe（这种想法）扎根于欧洲

时间状语从句：long before people realized how diverse language could be早在人们意识到语言会有多么的不同之前

翻译技巧:

此句可以采用层层剥茧的方法，先抓住整个句子的结构，然后再考虑具体的措词问题。在理清了上述结构之后，还需注意下面几个词语的处理：

assumed 假定；认为；以为

the process of thought思想的过程；思维过程

took root生根；在…扎下了根

很多人不能正确理解这个动词词组的意思，有的译成了“起源于…..”，“在…….出现了”，有的译成了“在….占统治地位”，都是不可接受的翻译。

long before 早在…之前；“在…之前早就…”

考生的错误在于不能辨别long before所限定的时间顺序，有译成“在扎根欧洲很长时间之前”，“不久的将来人们就意识到…”， 也有译成“很久以前人们就意识到…”。另外, 不要与before long（不久，不久以后）相混淆

diverse “丰富；差异性；多样性；千差万别”

多数人犯错是因为不认识该词意思，凭印象根据拼写类似词而译成“相反；倒转；转换”。

how diverse 多么的不同；多么的千差万别

could be 可能会是（can 过去式）

完整的译文：

希腊人认为，语言结构与思维的过程之间存在着某种联系。这种想法，早在人们意识到语言会有多么千差万别之前在欧洲就已经根深蒂固了。以上是第一题，更多详解可以找学鸣老师

Ⅶ 2005年真题阅读 词汇翻译 考研英语

ever 此处为副词，用于条件从句中，表示强调的目的。如果我们要长久的保护环境，那么一定要保证这些新的电厂对于环境是安全的，这一点很重要了。

Ⅷ 05年硕士研究生入学考试英语阅读理解试题译文

Everybody loves a fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish if you learn that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behaviour is regarded as “all too human”, with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance. But a study by Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it all too monkey, as well.
The researchers studied the behaviour of female brown capuchin monkeys. They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food tardily. Above all, like their female human counterparts, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males.
Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr. Brosnan's and Dr. de waal's; study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to exchange pieces of rock for slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that each could observe what the other was getting in return for its rock, their behaviour became markedly different.
In the world of capuchins grapes are luxury goods (and much preferable to cucumbers) So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to accept the slice of cucumber . Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber (without an actual monkey to eat it) was enough to rece resentment in a female capuchin.
The researches suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social emotions, in the wild, they are a co-operative, groupliving species, Such co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation, it seems, are not the preserve of people alone, Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear to other members of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved independently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems form the common ancestor that the species had 35 million years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question.
人人都喜欢大幅加薪，但是当你知道一个同事薪水加得比你还要多的时候，那么加薪带给你的喜悦感就消失的无影无踪了。如果他还以懒散出名的话，你甚至会变得怒不可遏。这种行为被看作是“人之长情”，其潜在的假定其他动物不可能具有如此高度发达的不公平意识。但是由佐治亚州亚特兰大埃里莫大学的Sarah Brosnan 和Frans de Waal进行的一项研究表明，它也是“猴之常情”。这项研究成果刚刚发表在《自然》杂志上。
研究者们对雌性棕色卷尾猴的行为进行了研究。它们看起来很可爱，性格温顺，合作，乐于分享食物。最重要的是，就象女人们一样，它们往往比雄性更关注“商品和服务”价值。这些特性使它们成为Brosnan 和 de Waal理想的研究对象。研究者们花了两年的时间教这些猴子用代币换取食物。正常情况下，猴子很愿意用几块石头换几片黄瓜。但是，当两个猴子被安置在隔开但相邻的两个房间里，能够互相看见对方用石头换回来什么东西时，猴子的行为就会变的明显不同。
在卷尾猴的世界里，葡萄是奢侈品（比黄瓜受欢迎得多）。所以当一只猴子用一个代币换回一颗葡萄时，第二只猴子就不愿意用自己的代币换回一片黄瓜。如果一只猴子根本无需用代币就能够得到一颗葡萄的话，那么另外一只就会将代币掷向研究人员或者扔出房间外，或者拒绝接受那片黄瓜。事实上，只要在另一房间里出现了葡萄（不管有没有猴子吃它），都足以引起雌卷尾猴的怨恨。
研究人员指出，正如人类一样，卷尾猴也受社会情感的影响。在野外，它们是相互合作的群居动物。只有当每只猴子感到自己没有受到欺骗时，这种合作才可能稳定。不公平而引起的愤怒感似乎不是人类的专利。拒绝接受较少的酬劳可以让这些情绪准确无误地传达给其它成员。但是这种公平感是在卷尾猴和人类身上各自独立演化而成，还是来自三千五百万前他们共同的祖先，这还是一个悬而未决的问题。
Do you remember all those years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we didn't know for sure? That the evidence was inconclusive, the science uncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans bought that nonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves.
There are upsetting parallels today, as scientists in one wave after another try to awaken us to the growing threat of global warming. The latest was a panel from the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the White House, to tell us that the Earth's atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is largely man-made. The clear message is that we should get moving to protect ourselves. The president of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added this key point in the preface to the panel's report “Science never has all the answers .But science does provide us with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical that out nation and the world base important policies on the best judgments that science can provide concerning the future consequences of present actions.”
Just as on smoking, voices now come from many quarters insisting that the science about global warming is incomplete, that it's Ok to keep pouring fumes into the air until we know for sure. This is a dangerous game: by the 100 percent of the evidence is in, it may be too late. With the risks obvious and growing, a prudent people would take out an insurance policy now.
Fortunately, the White House is starting to pay attention. But it's obvious that a majority of the president's advisers still don't take global warming seriously. Instead of a plan of action, they continue to press for more research-a classic case of “paralysis by analysis”.
To serve as responsible stewards of the planet, we must press forward on deeper atmospheric and oceanic research But research alone is inadequate. If the Administration won't take the legislative initiative, Congress should help to begin fashioning conservation measures .A bill by Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, which would offer financial incentives for private instry is a promising start Many see that the country is getting ready to build lots of new power plants to meet our energy needs. If we are ever going to protect the atmosphere, it is crucial that those new plants be environmentally sound.
还记得科学家们认为吸烟会致人死亡，而那些怀疑者们却坚持认为我们无法对此得出定论的时候吗？还记得怀疑者们坚持认为缺乏决定性的证据，科学也不确定的时候吗？还记得怀疑者们坚持认为反对吸烟的游说是为了毁掉我们的生活方式，而政府应该置身事外的时候吗？许多美国人相信了这些胡言乱语，在三十多年中，差不多有一千万烟民早早的进了坟墓。
现在出现了与吸烟类似的令人感到难过的事情。科学家们前仆后继，试图使我们意识到全球气候变暖所带来的日益严重的威胁。最近的行动是由白宫召集了一批来自国家科学院的专家团，他们告诉我们，地球气候毫无疑问正在变暖，而这个问题主要是人为造成的。明确的信息表明是我们应该立刻着手保护自己。国家科学院院长Bruce Alberts在专家团报告的前言中加上了这一重要观点：“科学解答不了所有问题。但是科学确实为我们的未来提供了最好的指导，关键是我们的国家和整个的世界在做重要决策时，应该以科学能够提供的关于人类现在的行为对未来影响最好的判断作为依据。
就象吸烟问题一样，来自不同领域的声音坚持认为有关全球变暖的科学资料还不完整。在我们证实这件事之前可以向大气中不断的排放气体。这是一个危险的游戏；到了有百分之百的证据的时候，可能就太晚了。随着风险越来越明显，并且不断增加，一个谨慎的民族现在应该准备一份保单了。
幸运的是，白宫开始关注这件事了。但是显然大多数总统顾问并没有认真看待全球气候变暖这个问题。他们没有出台行动计划，相反只是继续迫切要求进行更多的研究――这是一个经典的“分析导致麻痹案例”。
为了成为地球上有责任心的一员，我们必须积极推进对于大气和海洋的深入研究。但只有研究是不够的。如果政府不争取立法上的主动权，国会就应该帮助政府开始采取保护措施。弗吉尼亚的民主党议员Robert Byrd提出一项议案，从经济上激励私企，就是一个良好的开端。许多人看到这个国家正准备修建许多新的发电厂，以满足我们的能源需求。如果我们准备保护大气，关键要让这些新发电厂对环境无害。
Of all the components of a good night's sleep, dreams seem to be least within our control. In dreams, a window opens into a world where logic is suspended and dead people speak. A century ago, Freud formulated his revolutionary theory that dreams were the disguised shadows of our unconscious desires and rears, by the late 1970s. neurologists had switched to thinking of them as just “mental noise” the random byprocts of the neural-repair work that goes on ring sleep. Now researchers suspect that dreams are part of the mind's emotional thermostat, regulating moods while the brain is “off-line”. And one leading authority says that these intensely powerful mental events can be not only harnessed but actually brought under conscious control, to help us sleep and feel better. “It's your dream” says Rosalind Cartwright, chair of psychology at Chicago's Medical Center. “If you don't like it , change it.”
Evidence from brain imaging supports this view. The brain is as active ring REM (rapid eye movement) sleep-when most vivid dreams occur-as it is when fully awake, says Dr, Eric Nofzinger at the University of Pittsburgh. But not all parts of the brain are equally involved, the limbic system (the “emotional brain”)is especially active, while the prefrontal cortex (the center of intellect and reasoning) is relatively quiet. “We wake up from dreams happy of depressed, and those feelings can stay with us all day” says Stanford sleep researcher Dr, William Dement.
The link between dreams and emotions shows up among the patients in Cartwright’s clinic. Most people seem to have more bad dreams early in the night, progressing toward happier ones before awakening, suggesting that they are working through negative feelings generated ring the day. Because our conscious mind is occupied with daily life we don’t always think about the emotional significance of the day’s events-until, it appears, we begin to dream.
And this process need not be left to the unconscious. Cartwright believes one can exercise conscious control over recurring bad dreams As soon as you awaken, identify what is upsetting about the dream. Visualize how you would like it to end instead, the next time is occurs, try to wake up just enough to control its course. With much practice people can learn to, literally, do it in their sleep.
At the end of the day, there's probably little reason to pay attention to our dreams at all unless they keep us from sleeping of “we wake u in a panic,” Cartwright says. Terrorism, economic uncertainties and general feelings of insecurity have increased people's anxiety. Those suffering from persistent nightmares should seek help from a therapist For the rest of us, the brain has its ways of working through bad feelings. Sleep-or rather dream-on it and you'll feel better in the morning.
在高质量睡眠的所有因素中，梦似乎是最无法控制的一个。在梦中，窗户通向的世界里，逻辑暂时失去了效用，死人开口说话。一个世纪前，弗洛伊德阐述了革命性的理论，即梦是人们潜意识中欲望和恐惧经伪装后的预示；到了20世纪70年代末期，神经病学家们转而认为梦是“精神噪音”，即睡眠时进行的神经修复活动的一种杂乱的副产品。目前，研究人员猜想梦是大脑情感自动调节系统的组成部分，当大脑处于“掉线”状态时对情绪进行规整。一名主要的权威人士说，梦这种异常强烈的精神活动不仅能被驾驭，事实上还可以有意识地加以控制，以帮助我们更好地睡眠和感觉。芝加哥医疗中心心里学系主任 Rosalind Cartwright说“梦是你自己的，如果你不喜欢，就改变它。”
大脑造影的证据支持了以上观点。匹兹堡大学的埃里克博士说，在出现清晰梦境的快速动眼睡眠中大脑和完全清醒时一样活跃。但并非大脑的所有部分都一样，脑边缘系统（“情绪大脑”）异常活跃，而前额皮层（思维和推理的中心地带）则相对平静大。斯坦福睡眠研究员William Dement博士说：“我们从梦中醒来，或者高兴或者沮丧，这些情绪会伴随我们一整天。”
梦和情绪之间的联系在Cartwright的诊所的病人身上显露出来了。多数人似乎在晚上入睡的较早阶段做更多不好的梦，而在快睡醒前会逐渐做开心一些的梦，这说明人们在梦里渐渐克服了白天的不良情绪。因为清醒时我们的头脑被日常琐事占据着，所以并不总是想到白天发生的事情对我们情绪的影响，直到我们开始做梦，这种影响才出现。
这一过程不一定是无意识的。Cartwright认为人们可以练习有意识地控制噩梦的重演。你一醒来就立刻确定梦中有什么在困扰你，设想一下你所希望的梦的结局，下次再做同样的梦时，试图醒来以控制它的进程。通过多次练习，人们完全可以学会在梦中这样做。
Cartwright说，说到底，只要梦不使我们无法睡眠或“从梦中惊醒”，就没有理由太在意所做的梦。恐怖主义、经济不确定及通常的不安全感都增加了人们的焦虑。那些长期受到噩梦折磨的人应该寻求专家帮助，而对其他人来说，大脑有自动消除不良情绪的方法。安心睡觉甚至做梦，早上醒来时你会感觉好多了。
American no longer expect public figures, whether in speech or in writing, to command the English language with skill and gift. Nor do they aspire to such command themselves. In his latest book, Doing Our Own Thing:The Degradation of language and Music and why we should like, care, John McWhorter, a linguist and controversialist of mixed liberal and conservative views, sees the triumph of 1960s counter-culture as responsible for the decline of formal English.
Blaming the permissive 1960s is nothing new, but this is not yet another criticism against the decline in ecation. Mr.McWhorter’s academic speciality is language history and change, and he sees the graal disappearance of “whom” ,for example, to be natural and no more regranttable than the loss of the case-endings of Old English.
But the cult of the authentic and the personal, “doing our own thing”, has spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music. While even the modestly ecated sought an elevated tone when they put pen to paper before the 1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then has sought to capture spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highly personal, performative genre is the only form that could claim real liveliness. In both oral and written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity over craft.
Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both high and low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But it is less clear, to take the question of his subtitle, why we should, like care. As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, including non-standard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressive-there exists no language or dialect in the world that cannot convey complex ideas .He is not arguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight because we do not talk proper.
Russians have a deep love for their own language and carry large chunks of memorized poetry in their heads, while Italian politicians tend to elaborate speech that would seem old-fashioned to most English-speakers. Mr. McWhorter acknowledges that formal language is not strictly necessary, and proposes no radical ecation reforms-he is really grieving over the loss of something beautiful more than useful. We now take our English “on paper plates instead of china”. A shame, perhaps, but probably an inevitable one.
美国人已不再期待公众人物在演讲或写作中能运用技巧和文采来驾驭英语，而公众人物自己也不渴望这样。语言学家麦荷特喜好争论，他的观点混杂着自由派与保守派的看法。在他最近的书《做我们自己的事：语言和音乐的退化，以及为什么我们应该喜欢或在意？》中，这位学者认为60年代反文化运动的胜利要对正式英语的退化负责。
责备放纵的六十年代不是什么新鲜事，但这次算不上是对教育衰落的又一场批判。麦荷特先生的学术专长在于语言史和语言演变。举例来说，他认为“whom”一词的逐渐消失是自然的，并不比古英语中词格尾缀的消失更让人惋惜。
然而，“做自己的事”这一对事务真实性和个人性的崇高信条，已经导致了正式演讲、写作、诗歌及音乐的消亡。在20世纪60年代以前，仅受过一般教育的人在下笔时都会寻求一种更高雅的强调；而那之后，即使是最受关注的文章也开始逮住口语就写在纸面上。同样的，对于诗歌来说，非常个性化和富有表现力的创作风格成为了能够表达真实生动含义的唯一形式。无论作为口语还是书面语的英语，随意言谈胜过雅致的言辞，自我发挥也压过了精心准备。
麦荷特显示先生从上层和下层文化中列举了一系列有趣的例子，从而说明他记录的这种趋势是确凿无误的。但就书中副标题中的疑问：为什么我们应该、喜欢或在意，答案却不够明确。作为语言学家，麦荷特认为各种各样的人类语言，包括像黑人语言这样的非标准语言，都具有强大的表达力――世上没有传达不了复杂思想的语言或方言。不像其他大多数人，麦荷特先生并不认为我们说话方式不再规范就会使我们不能够准确的思考。
俄罗斯人深爱自己的语言，并在脑海中存储了大量诗歌；而意大利的政客们往往精心准备演讲，即使这在大多数讲英语的人们眼里已经过时。麦荷特先生认为正式语言并非不可或缺，也没有提出要进行彻底的教育改革――他其实只是为那些美好事务而不是实用品的消逝而哀叹。我们现在用“纸盘子”而非“瓷盘子”装着我们的英语大餐。真是惭愧啊，但很可能已无法避免。

Ⅸ 谁能贴一下2006年考研英语真题阅读理解和翻译部分的全文翻译

唐山市地处环渤海地区中心地带，北依燕山，南临渤海，东与秦皇岛市接壤，西与京、津毗邻，是一座有百年历史的重工业城市。唐山市海岸线长196.5公里，总面积1.3472万平方公里，总人口704万，其中市区面积3874平方公里，人口293.27万。唐山市国民生产总值连续几年在中国超200亿的城市中排名前25位，2002年的国民生产总值达1102亿元，占全省国民生产总值六分之一强。 唐山市地处河北东部，依山傍海。年平均气温为11℃，无霜期180天以上，年平均降雨量为760毫米，多集中在7月和8月。唐山市的大型供水工程有潘家口水库、大黑汀水库、邱庄水库、陡河水库等。 唐山市的矿产资源有煤、铁、石油、黄金、大理石、石灰岩、高岭土等47种。唐山与鞍山、本溪并称中国三大铁矿区，又是中国焦煤的主产区之一，冀东是著名的产金区之一。另外，唐山市还分布着广泛的冶金辅料、陶瓷建材等非金属，其中石灰岩资源分布比较集中。开滦（集团）有限责任公司、首钢迁安铁矿、冀东水泥集团有限责任公司、唐山陶瓷集团有限公司、金厂峪金矿等是开发上述资源的典型代表。 基础设施 唐山是1976年7.8级地震后重建的城市，市区功能分布合理、市政设施配套、抗震性能良好、环境清新优美。人均居住面积、供热普及率、燃气气化率、自来水普及率均居全国城市前列，1990年荣获联合国颁发的"人居荣誉奖"。唐山交通方便，京哈、通坨、京秦、大秦四条铁路干线横贯全境。高速公路发达密集，京沈、唐津、唐港、西外环四条高速公路在境内交汇互通，构成了独特壮观的"O+X"型高速公路网络，总里程达288公里，高速公路的密度达到发达国家水平，被国家列为全国45个公路主枢纽城市之一。唐山的水路运输能力持续增长，与北京联合兴建的京唐港是中国北方的重要出海口，港口货物吞吐量突破1400万吨，跻身全国港口20强。唐山已经形成以铁路、公路和海运为主体的综合运营体系，为经济的持续发展奠定了坚实的基础。 经济概况 工业：唐山被誉为中国近代工业的摇篮。这里矿产资源丰富，工业历史悠久。中国的第一袋机制水泥、第一座机械化矿井、第一条标准轨距铁路、第一台蒸汽机车和第一件卫生陶瓷都是在这里诞生的。经过一百多年的发展，唐山已成为全国重要的能源、原材料工业基地，形成了以煤炭、钢铁、电力、建材、机械、化工、陶瓷、纺织、造纸、食品为主的十大支柱产业。开滦（集团）有限责任公司、唐山钢铁集团有限责任公司、唐山发电总厂、冀东水泥集团有限责任公司、唐山陶瓷集团有限公司、惠达陶瓷集团、南堡盐场、唐山三友碱业集团等大型企业集团，在全国同行业中占有重要地位。随着产业结构的调整和技术革命步伐的加快，高新技术又为传统工业注入了新的活力。 农业：唐山农业自然资源丰富，北部山区盛产核桃、苹果、梨、桃、红果等干鲜果品，京东板栗在国内外久负盛名。中部平原盛产玉米、小麦、水稻等粮食作物和棉花、花生等经济作物。南部沿海既是渤海湾的重要渔场，又是著名的长芦盐的重要产区。沿海陆域海岸线长达196.5公里，在74万亩的沿海滩涂中，有55万亩适宜发展海水养殖业。"东方对虾"享誉中外，唐山的海、淡水鱼、虾、贝类、河蟹等水产品产量均居河北省第一位。唐山占山海之利，在大规模开发中正在向农业产业化和外向化迈进。为促进农业经济结构的战略性调整，唐山市把发展乳业、瘦肉型猪、花生、果菜、板栗、水产产业六大龙型经济作为区域特色经济，使唐山成为京津和东北地区重要的副食品基地。 商贸业：唐山市的商业贸易比较繁荣，随着全市经济和居民收入的稳步增长，居民消费水平和档次逐步提高，有力拉动了消费品市场的发展。2002年，全市社会消费品零售总额达277.35亿元。基本形成了布局合理、结构配套、连接城乡的市场网络。2002年，全市集贸市场个数发展到545个，其中各类专业市场115个。城乡集市贸易实现成交额296.9亿元。唐山市路南区小山市场、唐山市荷花坑市场、丰润县冀东胶合板批发市场、玉田县鸦鸿桥小商品批发市场的成交额均超过20亿元。大型超市、连锁店发展迅速。2002年唐山百货大楼（集团）公司的年销售额达到8.5亿元。市场物价平稳，2002年，全市居民消费价格指数为98.6%。 旅游 唐山旅游景观独特。清东陵是中国现存规模最大、建筑体系最完整的皇家陵寝，2000年，被列入世界文化遗产名录。唐山北部山区横亘着蜿蜒起伏的长城，它长达200多公里，囊括了整个明代长城的精华。景忠山庙宇宏伟壮观，是佛事圣地。潘家口、大黑汀两大水库气势雄伟，水下长城堪称一绝。南部沿海的菩提岛、月坨岛和金沙岛成鼎足之势，是天然的海中植物园。位于京唐港的金银滩是游人留连往返的海滨浴场。记录地震历史的抗震纪念碑、抗震纪念馆和经国务院批准重点保护的7处地震遗址，成为市中心区的独特景观。这里还是革命先驱李大钊的故乡，大钊纪念馆向后人展示着中国近代史的画卷。此外，现代化农业和别具一格的农村风情也成为观光旅游的热点。 对外开放 1988年，唐山被国家列为沿海对外经济开放地区之后，国民经济出现了持续、快速、稳健的发展势头。随着中国加入WTO，更为唐山带来了新的发展机遇。目前，全市共有500多家出口企业，出口商品达39大类、270个品种。2002年全市投产三资企业近千家，出口创汇1.84亿美元。唐山拥有三大经济技术开发区。高新经济技术开发区位于唐山市郊，是开放型科技经济区，它以服务周到、宽松优惠的投资环境，成为外商的投资热点。南堡经济技术开发区正在向现代化的滨海化工城迈进。精细化工园区和加工园区以完备的设施和热情的服务吸引着各国客商到此投资兴业。海港经济技术开发区构筑了全方位开放的新格局，它拥有国家认定的保税仓库，形成了前景广阔的海滨城市雏形。目前，唐山与120多个国家和地区保持密切的经济往来，正在成为外商投资的热点地区。全市外资企业近千家，日本三井物产、松下、丰田、NGK、伊藤忠、美国联合能源、英国BOC、德国西门子、法国达能、香港华润、长江基建、台湾晔联和庄头北等一批国际知名的大企业财团在唐山都设有企业。开放的唐山用优良的人文环境、稳定的法制环境和高效的服务环境，敞开大门，敞开胸怀，迎接全世界的来客。随着唐山对外开放力度的不断加大，对外交往日趋密切。近几年来，唐山市先后与瑞典的马尔墨市、日本的酒田市、英国的林肯市和美国的塞达拉皮兹市结为友好城市，使唐山在国际上的知名度越来越高。